For week seven of my internship, Dr. Beiler and I visited several
local museums. I wanted to see how these museums interpreted local history.
What were their interpretive strategies? How did they communicate their narratives
to their audience? What lingering ideas or questions were visitors expected to
leave with? It was important for me to understand the goals and focus of the
other local museums. For one thing, I needed to know how these museums
positioned themselves within the community. It was imperative that we find ways
to differentiate the Public History Center from other area museums. Why? Well,
because – and though this is just a hunch, of course – I cannot see reviewers
for the NEH roundly proclaiming “Hey, let’s give money to this museum, the one that wants to create something that already exists in the same city.” Indeed,
for the purpose of writing a persuasive grant application, it will be vital for
me to demonstrate how we are something new, how there is a need in the
community, and how we will offer something different from other museums in
central Florida.
Dr. Beiler and I ended up going to two museums on Friday
afternoon. The first was the Sanford Museum, located in downtown Sanford
looking out onto Lake Monroe. The museum was small – we were only there for
fifteen of twenty minutes – but it had many intriguing artifacts. The museum
touted Sanford businesses of yesteryear quite well. It also highlighted the entrepreneurs
of Sanford as well as all of the pro athletes who emanated from there. Perhaps
most interesting though, the museum had a room that recreated the personal
library of Henry Sanford, founder of the city and U.S. ambassador to Belgium.
The room was striking, and the thought of a nineteenth-century diplomat, back
from Washington, Europe or perhaps even sub-Saharan Africa (the Belgian Congo),
retiring to his reading room to perusing his collection (in seven languages, no
less) is enough to capture the imagination.
Our first stop, the Sanford Museum |
The second museum we visited was the Museum of Seminole
County History. The museum was bigger, and we spent about thirty or forty
minutes there (on a self-guided tour that was supposed to take about an hour
and twenty minutes). The museum had many interesting exhibits. The room devoted
to the “three lakes and three forts of Seminole County” conjured images of
early American settlement in the region. There was a room that explored
education – fortunately not too close to what we are envisioning for the PHC.
There was also a large facility in the rear of the museum that explored
Seminole County’s agricultural heritage. Altogether, the museum was a worthy
visit, though I did not leave with a clear sense of their intended message. To
be sure, the museum highlighted the development of the county, but there could
have been more cohesion between the exhibits.
Altogether, it was an excellent exercise. I am confident
that our museum will not simply repeat the narratives of other local museums
but instead compliment them by offering a fresh perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment