As I stated in my last post, the
semester has quickly come to an end. These last two posts provide an
opportunity for reflection on the internship, the semester, and grant writing. For
one thing, it seems apparent to me now (even more so than at the beginning of
the semester) how unique this opportunity was. Few interns get the opportunity
to tackle an NEH grant, and this experience will hopefully serve me well in
future endeavors.
One of the greatest challenges of
the semester was understanding how to employ the right language at the right
time. It is still something I do not completely grasp. What I mean, is that the
NEH application asks for very specific content about our organization, our
audience, our project, and our intended outcome. One of the challenges here was
first understanding exactly how we defined all of these aspects. Many people
had contributed to the PHC, and it was my job to familiarize myself with those
contributions so that, in turn, I could articulate them to the NEH. The other
challenge, though, is using the right language and lending the impression that you know something, even
if you don’t. This is a candid confession, but the reality is that no organization
or independent researcher has a 100% understanding of what their final product
will be. It is not to say I, or anyone else who helped me, was being disingenuous
about our project, but the ultimate goal, after all, is to receive funding. When
selling your idea to the NEH (or, presumably, any other funding agency), you
need to articulate it confidently, lending appearances that you have a complete
mastery of the many moving parts related to any project. It is this language,
inspiring confidence in the reviewers that you, more than your competitors,
have a unique project and a competent strategy for its development, which takes
practice. It is striking a balance
between your goals for your project and the funding agency’s intentions for
their grant money. It is using a subtle language that appeals to the exact
criteria the reviewers are searching for. If I am struggling to explain clearly
this subtle balancing act, it is reflective of my novice experience with grant
writing. In all, I have gained first hand exposure to skills and expectations
unique to grant writing.
And that is what will serve me in
the future. As I suggested, grant writing is a unique act: you need to
communicate clearly, employ your greatest persuasive tact, and know your
audience (and what they want to hear). I am still learning how to internalize all
of these demands; during the semester is became easy for me to revert back to
my original sensibilities and forget the intended audience and the priorities
of the funding agency. The next time I approach grant writing, though, (and
there will be a next time!), I will be that much better at tailoring my language
to the needs of the funding agency. Thanks to this internship, I’ll be better
for it.