On May 13th, with the Summer Semester already
underway, I placed a called to Dr. Rosalind Beiler, our History Department
Internship Coordinator at the University of Central Florida. I was in a
frenzied search for a last-minute internship. I needed something – anything –
to add to my summer course schedule. For certain financial aid reasons, I needed
to be considered a “full-time” student, with 6-credit hours of coursework at
the university. In my hasty search, Dr. Beiler proved truly accommodating. We
brainstormed possible internship ideas, of which there was no shortage. With
the exception of an internship working with the RICHES Mosaic Interface, all of
the available internships were based at the Public History Center in Sanford,
Florida. Dr. Beiler had a plethora of needs for the museum. The possibilities were
many: I could develop gallery guides, improve scripts for audio guides, work on
the “Georgetown” exhibit, craft an Institutional Interpretive Plan, or draft a
National Endowment for the Humanities Planning Grant for the museum.
Which one to choose? They all sounded interesting and each
had merit. Dr. Beiler indicated that the museum was in greatest need for an
interpretive plan. So be it, then. I was agreeable. Plus, her brief description
sounded intriguing. Still, I was intimidated. Unlike many of my peers, I had no
prior experience in public history, neither through coursework nor practice. I
feared this left me ill-prepared and ill-suited to craft a compelling
interpretive plan. Upon explaining this anxiety to Dr. Beiler, she reassured
me: “don’t worry,” she said, “You will
learn how.” I was allayed, but I was still unsure of the exact nature of my
internship? What is an interpretive
plan? Better yet, what is interpretation?
I know my fair share of jargon, but this was new to me.
So, the first week was devoted to figuring these things out.
I plunged headfirst into preliminary readings. I wanted to develop a working
definition of “interpretation” before thinking any further. First came books
like The Presence of the Past: Popular
Uses of History in American Life and Private
History in Public: Exhibition and the Settings of Everyday Life, among
others. The “public,” as it turns out, can and do develop their own histories,
undisturbed by our professional ruminations in our ivory tower. I am now
thoroughly convinced it is in our best interest, as a discipline, to remember
the public before they forget us. Reading works like Public and Academic History: A Philosophy and Paradigm helped me
realize, really, how close the two approaches to history really are. With an
enhanced understanding of the main themes and a newfound appreciation of public
history, and with week one under my belt, I turned my attention to mastering
interpretive planning.
No comments:
Post a Comment